Richard's Online Journal
[21/03/09] Webjunk: Comedy Theory
Final conclusive proof that there’s nothing less amusing than trying to analyse humour.
Clarke lists the patterns that are active in humour as positive repetition, division, completion, translation, applicative and qualitative recontextualization, opposition and scale.
“Some are more intuitive than others,” he admits. “The most basic, positive repetition, simply means that the unit is repeated in a similar form with the same purpose. As with all patterns, the repeated unit can be composed of any information available to the human brain, whether an entity, action or property. Then there’s opposition, in which we take the unit and turn it against itself, such as can be seen in a mirror image or if we turn an arrow back to point in the other direction, producing a pattern of symmetry. However, while all the patterns are relatively simple in structure the activity of some forms of translation and recontextualization can seem counter-intuitive at first sight. In instances of humour these patterns may be recognized individually or in any possible combination of the eight. Most instances are founded on one or two, although theoretically there is no limit to the number of patterns a person has recognized when they find something funny. Pattern recognition remains a subjective matter, just like any other perception.”
No wonder so many writers/comedians resort to stealing their gags. Or puns.
I don’t believe so, although if the publisher isn’t the author himself, the website certainly gives that impression. Me, I haven’t got the patience for working through all that rubbish. I’m too busy writing comedy stuff.
Posted by Richard on Thursday 26th March
Is this some kind of Onionesque parody that I’m too stupid to get? This quote from the site leads me to believe so:
“This document is currently being prepared for publication and is to be made publically available on the internet during 2009. Due to its substantial length (around 1500 pages) the document will be published in sections of 1000 instances throughout the year.”
Posted by Nick Playfair on Thursday 26th March